White maintained that the conflict between science and religion is really a conflict between science and dogma, rather than between science and religion.But according to Barnes it is an untenable position because dogma is a part of theology and any conflict between theology and science is necessarily conflict between science and religion. Joad writes, “I have sought to establish the commonplace proposition that there is no conflict between science and religion…Tags: A Litterary EssayStructure Of The Australian Curriculum EssayGreat Paper Writing MusicBusiness Plan Real Estate DevelopmentMake Work Cited Page EssayAustralian Essay Writing ServiceReviews For EssaysGay Marriage Is Immoral EssayUbc Thesis Citations
Science no doubt is dealing with more and more aspects of reality and trying to find out about the stars, moon and other plan its, but it has neither solved all problems nor does it hope to find a solution to the problems concerning the relation of man with the universe.
Anything which lies outside the area of scientific investigation cannot be proved non-existent.
As we see, one of the major characters of the novel, Alan Strang, gives horses a "God like" status.
Alan creates his own religion where Gods are nothing but horses that are controlled by Equus.
His father even destroyed the picture of the Crucifixion Alan had hung at the foot of his bed, which was apparently a very disturbing experience for Alan.
Alan evidently had difficulty understanding how anyone could be as irreverent as his father.The question whether religion is compatible with science occupied a prominent place in the discussions of the nineteenth century.Some thinkers hold that science and religion are incompatible.Horses also have a strong influence in Alan’s sexual growth and maturation as well as development as a person throughout the story.Strong visual images of horses are depicted in the stories told by Alan’s mother.The outlook of science is one of observation and test with sensory discrimination or instruments. If this is so, there seems to be no necessary reason why we should not accept the conclusion that in the last resort no complete account can be given even of the natural order, which does not make allowance for the intrusion into it of the supernatural.” In fact it is difficult to see how science can be opposed to religion as such.It cannot admit anything within its purview which is not reducible to test, measure of empirical validation. The object of science is to study the universe in its material aspect, while religion has as its immediate object God and the supernatural life.Harry Elmer Barnes stated, “While there is an irreconcilable conflict between fundamentalist religion and modern science none exists between the latter and humanism, because” the humanists frankly base their religion upon the findings of science.” Fundamentalist religion is certainly in conflict with science.It is on record that dogmatic religion opposed science and interfered with its development by every means possible.Religion is not unscientific; it is non-scientific. Our certified Educators are real professors, teachers, and scholars who use their academic expertise to tackle your toughest questions.