If we were to learn from our past mistakes, the following change is necessary.First, there should be close interaction between universities and ARIS with the scientists from the former lecturing the students from the latter and the faculty and students from the latter being given opportunities for participating in frontier research at the former.
If we were to learn from our past mistakes, the following change is necessary.Tags: Patroclus EssayA Story By Li-Young Lee EssayBiology Practical EssayBusiness Plan Of SalonModel Un Application EssayPersuasive Essay Hazing
Rather, with new regime in India, Scientific temper has taken a back seat in planning and implementation of S&T plans in India.
During 2000, University Grants Commission introduced Vedic astrology in universities but this experiment failed miserably .
The Government of India, through its National Council for Science and Technology Communication, dedicated its National Science Day on 28 February 2014, with the theme "Fostering Scientific Temper" to spread Nehru's vision .
Despite all these policy resolutions, Indian citizens remain deeply rooted in superstitions and blind faith in supernatural powers.
Over all, India’s achievements in the area of S&T are very impressive but this process of development, unfortunately, has not brought commensurate change in the traditional outlook of the people.
Ironically, the latest IT technology is being used to also propagate anti-science beliefs .
The latest Science, Technology and Innovation policy  of 2013 also stressed on “promoting the spread of scientific temper amongst all sections of society” as the first objective.
However, the greatest exponent of scientific temper in India was our first Prime Minister, Jawahar Lal Nehru [6,7], who wrote in 1946: "What is needed in India is the scientific approach, the adventurous and yet critical temper of science, the search for truth and new knowledge, the refusal to accept anything without testing and trial, the capacity to change previous conclusions in the face of new evidence, the reliance on observed fact and not on pre-conceived theory, the hard discipline of the mind—all this is necessary, not merely for the application of science but for life itself and the solution of its many problems”.