The books above the TV act as a kind of antidote to the TV. Woolf, Roth, Dostoyevsky, Baldwin, Dickens, Nabokov, Capote.
The books above the TV act as a kind of antidote to the TV. Woolf, Roth, Dostoyevsky, Baldwin, Dickens, Nabokov, Capote.Tags: Biopsychosocial EssayDropping High School EssaysSimple Business Plan SoftwareProficiency Essay RnekleriWhy Do You Write A Thesis StatementWriting An Essay For A Scholarship
Like it or not, I am in constant, real-time conversation with their contents.
The ledge above my desk is home to spirit animals (keeping in mind that selecting an arctic fox as one’s spirit animal does not make one an arctic fox).
Susan Sontag, who arranged her books by literary tradition (e.g.
Russian literature) and then chronology, would scoff at my mushy method.
So would James Wood, who has written that “in any private library the totality of books is meaningful, while each individual volume is relatively meaningless.” Certainly a lifetime of taste is more illuminating than whatever one read last week.
In interviews, the question of “desert island” books is difficult for writers to answer, not because it’s complex but because it’s misrepresentative.
I may not have a specific, contextualized association with every title in my possession, but most have had a direct impact.
And because of the way they’re positioned, they continue to.
In recent years, there’s been a rejection of the stodgy old alphabet in favor of organizational principles driven by color, size and genre. Aesthetics in literature are important, but literature as aesthetics makes me nervous.
When did a candle-topped pyramid of paperbacks become a symbol of depth?