dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work.The purpose is to offer an overview of significant literature published on a topic that critically analyzes a segment of a published body of knowledge through summary, classification, and comparison of prior research studies, reviews of literature, and theoretical articles.
dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work.The purpose is to offer an overview of significant literature published on a topic that critically analyzes a segment of a published body of knowledge through summary, classification, and comparison of prior research studies, reviews of literature, and theoretical articles.Tags: What Goes In The Introduction Of A Research PaperEssay On Autobiography Of A NotebookWriting My DissertationProblem Solving Strategies MathWar Poetry Essay QuestionsShort Essay About Money Can'T Buy Happiness9/11 Report Comic BookEssays On Accrual AccountingTransition Words For An Essay
White Smoke's grammar and spell check will assure that you do. In addition, with its dictionary, thesaurus, and writing enhancement tools, White Smoke will allow you to write precisely what you mean to say.
Its online, all-in-one-solution will make writing a literature review easier than ever. Define or identify the general topic, issue, or area of concern, thus providing an appropriate context for reviewing the literature.2.
Point out overall trends in what has been published about the topic; or conflicts in theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research and scholarship; or a single problem or new perspective of immediate interest.3.
Establish the writer's reason (point of view) for reviewing the literature; explain the criteria to be used in analyzing and comparing literature and the organization of the review (sequence); and, when necessary, state why certain literature is or is not included (scope). Group research studies and other types of literature (reviews, theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) according to common denominators such as qualitative versus quantitative approaches, conclusions of authors, specific purpose or objective, chronology, etc.2.
primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings)? Objectivity: Is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial?
Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point? Persuasiveness: Which of the author's theses are most/least convincing? Value: Are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing?Evaluate the current "state of the art" for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues pertinent to future study.3.Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the literature review and a larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession. Open web sources (somebody's home page, as opposed to peer-reviewed online journals or licensed database sites that provide access to scholarly works) are not usually considered reliable sources for academic research and should be used sparingly, if at all, and only after careful research into the sponsors of a site.Sources covered in the review may include scholarly journal articles, books, government reports, Web sites, etc.The literature review provides a description, summary and evaluation of each source.In other words, don't use generally available internet search engines for your literature review.2.Place each work in the context of its contribution to the understanding of the subject under review3.Summarize individual studies or articles with as much or as little detail as each merits according to its comparative importance in the literature, remembering that space (length) denotes significance.In assessing each piece, consideration should be given to:1. Are the author's arguments supported by evidence (e.g.Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration4.Identify new ways to interpret, and shed light on, any gaps in previous research5.