The differences between the two notions are plentiful and will be discussed in the course of this essay alongside can be seen as being brave, although invariably the person involved doesn’t consider the after-effects.
People who are perceived as being reckless are also seen as being irresponsible.
It is to be kept in mind the fact that moral courage is not the equivalent of recklessness.
While the first fights for noble moral reasons, the second one fights for nothing at all and stands up just for the sake of anarchy itself.
Rather, good intentions and motivations should fuel courageous actions.
As British author Samuel Johnson states, "Bravery has no place where it can avail nothing." In other words, courage or bravery is worthless and unnecessary if the final outcome cannot be beneficial.
For example, the terrorists involved with the September 11th tragedy were not considered to be courageous here in the United States. Nothing positive resulted from their actions, so the United States and her allies looked upon this as a cowardly action.
Courage is defined by the motivations and thoughts that exist within the action.
It is thus of the highest importance that these people either quit their jobs completely or they adapt their jobs to their values.
It is thus of the highest importance that moral courage takes over.