Leaders of the United States and Britain are under relentless questioning over whether they relied on intelligence estimates that deliberately exaggerated the threat of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to justify waging war.This is a matter of grave concern for Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi as well, since he accepted fully the American and British rationale for the war. and British troops in Iraq are still combing the country in search of such weapons. weapons inspector, questioned the nature of the many pieces of ”evidence” presented by the United States and Britain in the U. Security Council before the war and has noted it is quite likely that Iraq destroyed its weapons quite some time ago.If the two nations indeed exaggerated the threat of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, it would be even more reason for the international community to be apprehensive about Bush’s ”pre-emptive strike” doctrine.. that after such a war Britain would not be in the ... Saddam Hussein has "Weapons of Mass Destruction ...
Leaders of the United States and Britain are under relentless questioning over whether they relied on intelligence estimates that deliberately exaggerated the threat of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to justify waging war.Tags: Computer Technology EssaySecret Life Of Bees EssayLiterary Criticism EssayDriving Age Argument EssayEducational Action Research PapersStarting Up A Gym Business Plan
Showed first 250 characters Without a leader who is funding and encouraging terrorism, terrorist cells have been decentralized and fragmented thus rendering them less capable of staging dramatic, large-scale attacks.
The ensuing war between the United States and Iraq has been a topic of controversy for several years now.
Is this war with Iraq justifiable, or has America jumped into something that could have possibly been avoided?
To answer these questions a comparison should be made between the characteristics of this war and those that constitute a just war.
When the International Atomic Energy Agency analyzed the document upon which the dossier was based, however, the document itself was found to be a fabrication. Also according to this article the eradication of biological weapons in Iraq may be as important or more important to the people ... But no evidence has been published in support of that theory, but American experts say, and United Nations inspectors found ...
about in Britain, research and intelligence experts, also convinced that there are more germ warfare agents left in Iraq than previously ...
But Britain’s Parliament has decided to conduct an inquiry into whether Blair was right in deciding to wage war.
In the United States, the Defense Intelligence Agency has recently admitted having compiled a report last fall that included an analysis concluding there was no solid evidence to substantiate a claim that Iraq had chemical weapons.
The dossier also stated Iraq had the means to deploy chemical and biological weapons ”within 45 minutes.’ ‘ But according to the BBC, this part of the report was ”amended” by the prime minister’s office to make it more impressive, and a senior intelligence officer has admitted the fabrication.
”Completely and totally untrue,’ ‘ British Prime Minister Tony Blair said in dismissing allegations his government had overstated Iraq’s weapons capability to justify the war.